閱讀障礙

看起來就是閱讀障礙！

我的托福已經出來了。
Test Test Date Reading Listening Speaking Writing Total
TELXML December 14, 2007 7 23 27 15 72



Reading Skills Level Your Performance
Reading Low(0-14)

Test takers who receive a score at the LOW level, as you did, typically understand some of the information presented in academic texts in English that require a wide range of reading abilities, but their understanding is limited.

Test takers who receive a score at the LOW level typically

* have a command of basic academic vocabulary, but their understanding of less common vocabulary is inconsistent;
* have limited ability to understand and connect information, have difficulty recognizing paraphrases of text information, and often rely on particular words and phrases rather than a complete understanding of the text;
* have difficulty identifying the author's purpose, except when that purpose is explicitly stated in the text or easy to infer from the text; and
* can sometimes recognize major ideas from a text when the information is clearly presented, memorable, or illustrated by examples but have difficulty doing so when the text is more demanding.


Listening Skills Level Your Performance
Listening High(22-30)

Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand conversations and lectures in English that present a wide range of listening demands. These demands can include difficult vocabulary (uncommon terms, or colloquial or figurative language), complex grammatical structures, abstract or complex ideas, and/or making sense of unexpected or seemingly contradictory information.

When listening to lectures and conversations like these, test takers at the HIGH level typically can

* understand main ideas and important details, whether they are stated or implied;
* distinguish more important ideas from less important ones;
* understand how information is being used (for example, to provide evidence for a claim or describe a step in a complex process);
* recognize how pieces of information are connected (for example, in a cause-and-effect relationship);
* understand many different ways that speakers use language for purposes other than to give information (for example, to emphasize a point, express agreement or disagreement, or convey intentions indirectly); and
* synthesize information, even when it is not presented in sequence, and make correct inferences on the basis of that information.


Speaking Skills Level Your Performance
Speaking about familiar topics Fair(2.5 - 3.0)

Your responses indicate you are able to speak in English about your personal experiences and opinions in a mostly clear and coherent manner. Your speech is mostly clear with only occasional errors. Grammar and vocabulary are somewhat limited and include some errors. At times, the limitations prevent you from elaborating fully on your ideas, but they do not seriously interfere with overall communication.

Speaking about campus situations Good(3.5 - 4.0)

Your responses indicate an ability to speak effectively in English about reading material and conversations typically encountered by university students. Overall, your responses are clear and coherent, with only occasional errors of pronunciation, grammar, or vocabulary.

Speaking about academic course content Good(3.5 - 4.0)

Your responses demonstrate an ability to communicate effectively in English about academic topics typical of first-year university studies. Your speech is mostly clear and fluent. You are able to use appropriate vocabulary and grammar to explain concepts and ideas from reading or lecture material. You are able to talk about key information and relevant details with only minor inaccuracies.

Writing Skills Level Your Performance
Writing based on reading and listening Limited(1.0 - 2.0)

Your response was judged as limited due to

* failure to understand the lecture or reading passage;
* deficiencies in relating the lecture to the reading passage; and/or
* many grammatical errors and/or very unclear expressions and sentence structures.


Writing based on knowledge and experience Fair(2.5 - 3.5)

You expressed ideas with reasons, examples, and details, but your response indicated weaknesses such as

* you may not provide enough specific support and development for your main points;
* your ideas may be difficult to follow because of how you organize your essay or because of the language you use to connect your ideas; and/or
* grammatical mistakes or vague/incorrect uses of words may make the writing difficult to understand.

你知道這些在說什麼嗎？
屁話，都是屁話！
一切都是要我繼續拖延時間，低等的外來生物。